This paper compares and contrasts three types of auditory feedback techniques to aid safe manual material handling operations. The work reported aims to reduce lower back injuries by allowing people to gauge the forces acting on their lower back whilst moving an object from one location to another. This is particularly useful if the movement is repetitive in nature. Sensors monitor the human user’s head and hand movements in real-time. An analysis of Task Completion Time, Percentage of Harmful Lifts and Response Time to Feedback were analysed and used to identify the appropriateness of each auditory feedback technique.
NOTE: TO READ THIS AND OTHER IPROMS 2006 PAPERS, PLEASE REGISTER FOR THE CONFERENCE.
REGISTRATION IS FREE.
CLICK here; TO REGISTER.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| IPROMS_Faieza_finalppt.ppt | 2.09 MB |

Thanks for your contribution in IPROMS 2006. I have a few questions.
What is the intention to test auditory feedback using white-noise, pitch and tempo? Are there any other options?
How can this autidtory feedback techniques be applied into the industry?
Thanks.