Consisted of a project manager, designers (mechanical, electronic, manufacturing engineers), foreman, safety specialist, maintenance person and several workers
Safety analysis
6.1 Case 1: Steel factory – 4/6
Procedure
- Several sessions during the analysis process
- The hazards, danger zones and different tasks were analysed using 3D models and a VE
- Animation of the machines for the identification of hazards
- 3D models were viewed at different angles and different distances during the sessions
- The tasks were analysed using animation.
6.1 Case 1: Steel factory – 5/6
6.1 Case 1: Steel factory – 6/6
Fig. 2. Examples of machines and manual tasks in a manufacturing process models in VE
6.2 Case 2: Medium size factories – 1/2
The aims of the case studies were by implementing VE to improve
• Capacity
• Production efficiency
• Safety and ergonomics
´
Case studies in a
• food factory,
• factory for plastics injection moulded products,
• factory producing paper products
6.2 Case 2: Medium size factories – 2/2
Problems identified with VE (examples)
collision points, narrow workplaces, uncomfortable or unsafe working heights, pillar location faults, contamination risks.
Findings from the implementation of VE
• increase of communication between workers, designers, health personnel and company supervisors and managers
• fast redesign of the identified problematic targets
6.3 Case 3: Vehicle manufactures – 1/2
The aim of the case studies was to study the possibilities to analyse and enhance Human-machine systems with dynamics simulation and visualisation in designing mobile working machines.
The studies included:
• Implementation of virtual prototypes, simulation data visualised in VE, posture analysis and other ergonomics analyses
Simulation with VE or AR systems, like VEM systems (e.g. PIMEX), is feasible and effective in model verification.
6.3 Case 3: Vehicle manufactures – 2/2

6.4 Case 4: Contamination problems in production systems
Problem: •Contamination affected products in a production line where an increased level of cleanliness was required.
Analysis: •The production system included several machines and manipulators, • The particle concentration in the production line had a cyclic nature. •VEM videos showed that the cause of contamination was one of the pneumatic manipulators.
Result: • When the cause of contamination was identified it was easy to find a solution to this problem.
7 Application fields and future development - 1/4
According to the case study findings:
AR/VR technologies are potential tools for
• handling the information in design
• enhancing innovativeness during the process
• enhancing the quality of designs
• enhancing the design process itself.
7 Application fields and future development - 2/4
According to the case studies VR and AR technologies have several synergetic advantages. In fact, they could be implemented in design process flexibly according to the needs of information. Existing information on a production system to be enhanced is very useful in designing a new one, and is usually in the form of “reality”.
The integration of “reality tools” (AR) and “virtuality tools” (VE)
(rather than the diverse use of the tools) will be the key issue for developing the design process, production systems and the environment.
7 Application fields and future development – 3/4
7 Application fields and future development – 4/4
A hypothesis of participatory design process:
Different reality - virtuality technologies can be integrated during the different phases of participatory design process, and the integration will enhance the design process when focusing towards enhanced production systems and environment.
5. Conclusions
Virtuality - reality technologies have evolved during the last decade, but need still improvements into its usability, integration ability, and technological aspects such as display technology, haptics, and motion capture.
To increase the implementations of virtuality - reality technology in the design of production systems, improvements must also be made to the design procedures.
Implementing a number of different virtual technologies rather than just one could provide more beneficial advantages during the design process.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by Tekes (National Technology Agency of Finland).
VTT is partner of the Innovative Production Machines and Systems (I*PROMS) Network of Excellence (
http://www.iproms.org).